adroitpmc logo
Follow us on
LinkedIn Profile
India
+91 9585 465 919
+91 6382 063 295
madhu@adroitpmc.com
ram.s@adroitpmc.com
Oman
+968 9380 0315
info-me@adroitpmc.com
manikandan@adroitpmc.com

Challenging an Arbitrator’s Procedural Order

๐Œ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ง๐š๐›๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ฌ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐Ÿ— ๐š๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ข๐œ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐›๐ฃ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐œ๐ž๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐š๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ž๐ซ ๐ฉ๐š๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ž๐ ๐›๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐€๐ซ๐›๐ข๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐จ๐ซ (Delhi High Court)
ย 
Jagdish Tyres Pvt. Ltd. Vs Indag Rubber Limited (May 2024)
ย 
The petitioner has filed the present application under section9 of the Arbitration Act seeking to challenge the order wherein the Arbitrator framed issues and directed the matter for evidence.
ย 
The grievance of the Petitioner is that it had wished to file an amended statement of defense consisting of the bank statements related to the transactions between the Petitioner to the Respondent. However, the Arbitrator without taking the same record, proceeded to frame issues.
ย 
The Court observed the following

โœ๏ธ The petitioner is not conducting itself properly and with diligence, before the ld. Arbitrator and the Arbitrator has rightly proceeded in the matter for framing of issues and evidence.
ย 
๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš–๏ธ ๐‘ป๐’‰๐’† ๐’‘๐’“๐’†๐’”๐’†๐’๐’• ๐’‘๐’†๐’•๐’Š๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’ ๐’Š๐’” ๐’๐’๐’• ๐’Ž๐’‚๐’Š๐’๐’•๐’‚๐’Š๐’๐’‚๐’ƒ๐’๐’† ๐’‚๐’” ๐’•๐’‰๐’† ๐‘ท๐’†๐’•๐’Š๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’๐’†๐’“ ๐’„๐’‚๐’๐’๐’๐’• ๐’ƒ๐’† ๐’‘๐’†๐’“๐’Ž๐’Š๐’•๐’•๐’†๐’… ๐’•๐’ ๐’„๐’‰๐’‚๐’๐’๐’†๐’๐’ˆ๐’† ๐’‚ ๐’‘๐’“๐’๐’„๐’†๐’…๐’–๐’“๐’‚๐’ ๐’๐’“๐’…๐’†๐’“ ๐’‘๐’‚๐’”๐’”๐’†๐’… ๐’ƒ๐’š ๐’•๐’‰๐’† ๐‘จ๐’“๐’ƒ๐’Š๐’•๐’“๐’‚๐’•๐’๐’“ ๐’–๐’๐’…๐’†๐’“ ๐‘บ๐’†๐’„๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’ 9 ๐’๐’‡ ๐’•๐’‰๐’† ๐‘จ๐’„๐’•, 1996. ๐‘ป๐’‰๐’† ๐’“๐’†๐’๐’Š๐’†๐’‡ ๐’”๐’๐’–๐’ˆ๐’‰๐’• ๐’‰๐’†๐’“๐’†๐’Š๐’ ๐’‚๐’“๐’† ๐’๐’๐’• ๐’Š๐’๐’•๐’†๐’“๐’Š๐’Ž ๐’Ž๐’†๐’‚๐’”๐’–๐’“๐’†๐’” ๐’‚๐’” ๐’„๐’๐’๐’•๐’†๐’Ž๐’‘๐’๐’‚๐’•๐’†๐’… ๐’–๐’๐’…๐’†๐’“ ๐’•๐’‰๐’† ๐’”๐’‚๐’Š๐’… ๐’‘๐’“๐’๐’—๐’Š๐’”๐’Š๐’๐’.
ย 
๐Ÿ”— The petitioner by filing a petition under Section 9 of the Act, 1996 the Petitioner is merely attempting to avoid the appellate provision under Section 37 of the Act, 1996 which clearly stipulates as to which orders are appealable. The petition is nothing but a clever attempt to seek relief when the petition itself is not maintainable.
ย 
Accordingly, the present application under section 9 was dismissed.

Ram Subramanian

Denounce with righteous indignation and dislike men who are beguiled and demoralized by the charms pleasure moment so blinded desire that they cannot foresee the pain and trouble.

Latest Portfolio

Need Any Help? Or Looking For an Agent

ยฉ Adroit PMC 2024. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer

This website has been designed only for the purposes of dissemination of basic information on ADROIT; information which is otherwise available on the internet, various public platforms and social media. Careful attention has been given to ensure that the information provided herein is accurate and up-to-date.

This website is not an attempt to advertise or solicit clients and does not seek to create or invite any lawyer-client relationship. The links provided on this website are to facilitate access to basic information on ADROIT, and, to share the various thought leadership initiatives undertaken by it. The content herein or on such links should not be construed as a legal reference or legal advice. Readers are advised not to act on any information contained herein or on the links and should refer to legal counsels and experts in their respective jurisdictions for further information and to determine its impact.

Terms of use andย Privacyย policy