Blog Detail
ðŒð’ðŒð„ðƒ ð€ðœð ðŸðŸŽðŸŽðŸ” - ð¨ð¯ðžð«ð«ð¢ððžð¬ ðð¡ðž ðšð«ð›ð¢ðð«ðšðð¢ð¨ð§ ðšð ð«ðžðžð¦ðžð§ð ð›ðžðð°ðžðžð§ ðð¡ðž ð©ðšð«ðð¢ðžð
Posted on 03-03-2022ðŒð’ðŒð„ðƒ ð€ðœð ðŸðŸŽðŸŽðŸ” - ð’ðžðœðð¢ð¨ð§ ðŸðŸ–, ðƒð¢ð¬ð©ð®ððž ð«ðžð¬ð¨ð¥ð®ðð¢ð¨ð§ ð¦ðžðœð¡ðšð§ð¢ð¬ð¦ ð¨ð¯ðžð«ð«ð¢ððžð¬ ðð¡ðž ðšð«ð›ð¢ðð«ðšðð¢ð¨ð§ ðšð ð«ðžðžð¦ðžð§ð ð›ðžðð°ðžðžð§ ðð¡ðž ð©ðšð«ðð¢ðžð¬: Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of ð‘ƒð‘Ÿð‘–ð‘›ð‘ð‘–ð‘ð‘Žð‘™ ð¶â„Žð‘–ð‘’ð‘“ ð¸ð‘›ð‘”ð‘–ð‘›ð‘’ð‘’ð‘Ÿ ð‘£. ð‘€/𑆠ð‘€ð‘Žð‘›ð‘–ð‘â„Žð‘Žð‘– ð´ð‘›ð‘‘ ðµð‘Ÿð‘œð‘ [Order dated July 5, 2017], upheld the Gujarat High Court’s judgment on the interpretation of Section 18. The High Court held that since the Act is special legislation and has an overriding effect, the parties governed by it are bound to follow the mechanism provided under Section 18 of the Act. Reaffirming this, a Similar view has been taken by the High Courts in the cases of ð‘€ð‘Žð‘ð‘˜ð‘–ð‘›ð‘¡ð‘œð‘ â„Ž ðµð‘¢ð‘Ÿð‘› ð¿ð‘–ð‘šð‘–ð‘¡ð‘’ð‘‘ ð‘£. ð‘€ð‘–ð‘ð‘Ÿð‘œ ð‘Žð‘›ð‘‘ ð‘†ð‘šð‘Žð‘™ð‘™ ð¸ð‘›ð‘¡ð‘’ð‘Ÿð‘ð‘Ÿð‘–ð‘ ð‘’ð‘ ð¹ð‘Žð‘ð‘–ð‘™ð‘–ð‘¡ð‘Žð‘¡ð‘–ð‘œð‘› ð¶ð‘œð‘¢ð‘›ð‘ð‘–ð‘™ [Judgment dated February 10, 2020] and ð˜ð˜¦ð˜¥ ð˜—ð˜³ð˜¢ð˜¬ð˜¢ð˜´ð˜© ð˜·. ð˜—. ð˜—ð˜°ð˜¯ð˜³ð˜¢ð˜® [Judgment dated January 23, 2020]. #msme #arbitration ADROIT CLAIMS & ADR CONSULTANTS
CIARb / ICA Accredited Members
All Rights Reserved